A network of 1,500+ developers, consultants and delivery people sits behind both routes. The difference is whether the people end up on our payroll or yours.
Developers embedded in your team, working your board and your rituals. We handle the coding; you stay in control via updates and QA.
When the capability belongs in-house permanently, we source and vet for it — developers, consultants, project and product managers we would be happy to hire ourselves.
These are the commercial models for developers we place in your team — WMS specialists and general software engineers alike. Recruitment works differently: we source and vet, you hire.
For work that can be specified up front. We write the FRS, quote against it, and carry the estimation risk. You approve once and know the number.
For a backlog that changes faster than it can be specified. Developers sit in your team, you set the priorities, and you see spend and progress as it happens.
For long-term needs. Named developers reserved to your platform and your systems, so the knowledge of how your operation actually runs stays with the team instead of being rebuilt each time.
Where the work needs conversation, our developers run on your clock — your stand-ups, your release calls, your change windows. Where it does not, we deliberately run offset: work is picked up as your day ends and waiting for you when it starts again.
Every profile you see has passed the same steps we use for our own hires — developers, but equally project and product managers, functional and technical consultants, architects and analysts. You interview the last stage, not the first.
Tell us the problem and we'll tell you which of these four routes fits — including when the answer is none of them.